The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2020
A Survey-Based Study of Patient-Centered Costs Associated With Indwelling Pleural Catheters.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aboudara Matthew, Roller Lance, Lentz Rob, Rickman Otis B, Gillaspie Erin A, Maldonado Fabien
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) are effective at palliating benign and malignant pleural effusions (MPE). They have also been found to be cost effective from a third-party payor perspective. Little is known of the impact IPCs have on patient-centered quality of life outcomes such as financial burden and patient and caregiver burden. We performed a cross-sectional survey study evaluating the impact of IPCs on multiple patient and caregiver quality of life metrics.
METHODS: Patients ≥ 18 years old with an IPC in place for 2 months were eligible. Twenty patients were recruited over a 10-month period. Patients completed the CDC-Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)-4 and a HRQOL-financial questionnaire. The primary objective was to describe the socio-economic impact of IPCs. Demographic and IPC specific data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used.
RESULTS: The mean (SD) age was 64.3 (0.70). The indication was MPE in 19/20. All patients had medical insurance. Medicare or Medicaid (CMS) comprised 10/20 of payors. The median (IQR) copay for private insurers was $238.45 (72-875); 11/20 had additional costs related to the IPC; 4/20 had significant life changes after the IPC; 17/20 received assistance from a non-paid caregiver; 6/20 patients could not do activities because of the IPC and this negatively impacted QOL in 3/6 of those patients.
CONCLUSION: Patients with IPCs may experience negative life consequences, incur additional medical expenses, and require assistance from a non-paid caregiver. Activities may be negatively impacted by IPC. Discussion of alternative means of symptom palliation and pleurodesis would be beneficial.
METHODS: Patients ≥ 18 years old with an IPC in place for 2 months were eligible. Twenty patients were recruited over a 10-month period. Patients completed the CDC-Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)-4 and a HRQOL-financial questionnaire. The primary objective was to describe the socio-economic impact of IPCs. Demographic and IPC specific data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used.
RESULTS: The mean (SD) age was 64.3 (0.70). The indication was MPE in 19/20. All patients had medical insurance. Medicare or Medicaid (CMS) comprised 10/20 of payors. The median (IQR) copay for private insurers was $238.45 (72-875); 11/20 had additional costs related to the IPC; 4/20 had significant life changes after the IPC; 17/20 received assistance from a non-paid caregiver; 6/20 patients could not do activities because of the IPC and this negatively impacted QOL in 3/6 of those patients.
CONCLUSION: Patients with IPCs may experience negative life consequences, incur additional medical expenses, and require assistance from a non-paid caregiver. Activities may be negatively impacted by IPC. Discussion of alternative means of symptom palliation and pleurodesis would be beneficial.