Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2019
PV isolation guided by esophageal visualization with a tailored ablation strategy for the avoidance of esophageal thermal injury: a randomized trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ye Yang, Chen Shi-Quan, Lu Yi-Fei, Jiang Ru-Hong, Liu Qiang, Sheng Xia, Zhang Zuwen, Sun Ya-Xun, Zhang Pei, Yu Lu, Chen Meng-Meng, Fu Guo-Sheng, Jiang Chen-Yang
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Radiofrequency ablation along the posterior wall of the left atrium may lead to atrioesophageal fistula due to esophageal thermal injury. The purpose of our study was to prospectively investigate whether ablation guided by soluble contrast esophageal visualization (SCEV) reduces injury during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.
METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were randomized to a SCEV group (n = 39) and control group without visualization (n = 39). Cine imaging of the esophagus was performed during soluble contrast swallowing at the beginning of ablation, after adjacent ipsilateral PVI and at the end of the procedure. The ablation lesion set was modified to avoid radiofrequency delivery within the contrast esophagram boundaries. In the control group, a single final ingestion was performed at the end of the procedure. Esophageal injury was assessed by esophagogastroscopy within 24 h in all patients.
RESULTS: In the control group, the ablation lesion crossed over the esophagus in 46.2% of patients, whereas in SCEV group, the ablation line violated the boundaries of the esophagus unavoidably in 15.4% of patients (confidence interval (CI); 1.61-13.98, p = 0.003). The incidence of esophageal injury was significantly lower in patients that underwent ablation with SCEV (5.1% vs. 20.5%, CI; 0.04-1.06, p = 0.042). Regardless of randomization group, patients who received ablation which overlapped the esophagus had a higher incidence of esophageal injury compared with those without overlap (37.5 vs. 1.9%, CI; 3.73-271.37, p = 0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal contrast visualization helps to reduce the potential for esophageal injury during paroxysmal AF ablation. This simple procedural adjunct has important implications to improve safety of paroxysmal AF ablation procedures globally.
METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were randomized to a SCEV group (n = 39) and control group without visualization (n = 39). Cine imaging of the esophagus was performed during soluble contrast swallowing at the beginning of ablation, after adjacent ipsilateral PVI and at the end of the procedure. The ablation lesion set was modified to avoid radiofrequency delivery within the contrast esophagram boundaries. In the control group, a single final ingestion was performed at the end of the procedure. Esophageal injury was assessed by esophagogastroscopy within 24 h in all patients.
RESULTS: In the control group, the ablation lesion crossed over the esophagus in 46.2% of patients, whereas in SCEV group, the ablation line violated the boundaries of the esophagus unavoidably in 15.4% of patients (confidence interval (CI); 1.61-13.98, p = 0.003). The incidence of esophageal injury was significantly lower in patients that underwent ablation with SCEV (5.1% vs. 20.5%, CI; 0.04-1.06, p = 0.042). Regardless of randomization group, patients who received ablation which overlapped the esophagus had a higher incidence of esophageal injury compared with those without overlap (37.5 vs. 1.9%, CI; 3.73-271.37, p = 0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal contrast visualization helps to reduce the potential for esophageal injury during paroxysmal AF ablation. This simple procedural adjunct has important implications to improve safety of paroxysmal AF ablation procedures globally.