Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022
[Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) : Update D].
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Torsello Giovanni Federico
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Abdominal aortic aneurysms can either be treated by open surgery or endovascular repair. In both cases, prostheses are implanted to prevent potentially lethal aortic ruptures.
OBJECTIVES: Studies seeking to identify the optimal treatment came to diverging conclusions. The goal of this article is to shed light on the discussion of which treatment option is to be preferred.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This article summarizes the relevant studies on elective and emergency abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The presented studies are discussed, and results are interpreted and compared.
RESULTS: While most studies indicate lower short-term mortality rates in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), mortality rates converged in multiple trials and even showed a lower mortality rate for open repair in mid-term analyses. Most recent studies indicate long-term equivalence in terms of mortality and a higher rate of secondary interventions in EVAR patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The current body of literature indicates no real advantage of one therapy over another. The choice of therapy should depend on anatomic, clinical, and logistic criteria.
OBJECTIVES: Studies seeking to identify the optimal treatment came to diverging conclusions. The goal of this article is to shed light on the discussion of which treatment option is to be preferred.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This article summarizes the relevant studies on elective and emergency abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The presented studies are discussed, and results are interpreted and compared.
RESULTS: While most studies indicate lower short-term mortality rates in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), mortality rates converged in multiple trials and even showed a lower mortality rate for open repair in mid-term analyses. Most recent studies indicate long-term equivalence in terms of mortality and a higher rate of secondary interventions in EVAR patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The current body of literature indicates no real advantage of one therapy over another. The choice of therapy should depend on anatomic, clinical, and logistic criteria.