MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/hrt.2005.077016

Медицинская библиотека · Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2006

Perforated aortic valve leaflets.

Szczotka-Flynn L, Slaughter M, McMahon T, Barr J, Edrington T, Fink B, Lass J, Belin M, Iyengar S K, CLEK Study Group

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine if disease severity is associated with a family history of keratoconus.

METHODS

Markers of disease severity in the CLEK Study cohort were assessed to determine if they could discriminate individuals with and without family history. Logistic regression was used to examine association between corneal scarring, average corneal power, flat and steep keratometry readings, and higher-order root mean square (RMS) wavefront error with family history.

RESULTS

In univariate analyses, none of the severity indices had any significant associations with family history; however, contact lens use, gender, and Caucasian race were found to be significant predictors. After controlling for these confounders, there were no significant associations between any severity indices and family history.

CONCLUSIONS

Presence or absence of family history is not associated with more severe clinical disease, at least when each marker for severity is considered independently. The results of this analysis are important for genetic studies of keratoconus in that it will allow recruitment of keratoconus patients across all stages of disease severity because it does not influence familial aggregation.

Для цитирования: Szczotka-Flynn L, Slaughter M, McMahon T, Barr J, Edrington T, Fink B, Lass J, Belin M, Iyengar S K, CLEK Study Group. Perforated aortic valve leaflets.. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2006. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2005.077016.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.