Cornea · 2007
Long-term outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy in eyes with previous epikeratophakia for keratoconus.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xie Lixin, Gao Hua, Shi Weiyun
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine the long-term safety and effectiveness of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in the treatment of refractive errors after epikeratophakia (EP) for keratoconus.
METHODS: Ten patients (14 eyes) who had refractive errors after EP for keratoconus received PRK surgery. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refractive error, corneal astigmatism, pachymetry, corneal topography, and complications were monitored.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up after PRK was 63.4 +/- 19.8 months. Mean spherical equivalent was -5.5 +/- 3.9 D before PRK, -0.9 +/- 0.5 D at 1 month after PRK, and -1.5 +/- 1.0 D at 3 years. Mean astigmatism was 4.2 +/- 2.1 D before PRK, 1.2 +/- 0.5 D at 1 month after PRK, and 1.5 +/- 0.6 D at 3 years. Thirteen (93%) eyes had an UCVA <20/40, and 12 (86%) had a BSCVA of 20/40 or better before PRK. At 1 year, the UCVA was 20/40 or better in 8 (57%) eyes, and the BSCVA was 20/40 or better in all eyes. Mean central corneal thickness was 749 +/- 35 microm before PRK and 621 +/- 56 mum at 3 years. During the follow-up period, haze (grade no more than 1.0) was observed in 2 eyes. No immune rejection episode or recurrent keratoconus was found.
CONCLUSIONS: PRK appears to be reliable and safe for the correction of residual ametropia after EP for keratoconus, and the visual acuity can remain stable after PRK for a long time.
METHODS: Ten patients (14 eyes) who had refractive errors after EP for keratoconus received PRK surgery. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refractive error, corneal astigmatism, pachymetry, corneal topography, and complications were monitored.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up after PRK was 63.4 +/- 19.8 months. Mean spherical equivalent was -5.5 +/- 3.9 D before PRK, -0.9 +/- 0.5 D at 1 month after PRK, and -1.5 +/- 1.0 D at 3 years. Mean astigmatism was 4.2 +/- 2.1 D before PRK, 1.2 +/- 0.5 D at 1 month after PRK, and 1.5 +/- 0.6 D at 3 years. Thirteen (93%) eyes had an UCVA <20/40, and 12 (86%) had a BSCVA of 20/40 or better before PRK. At 1 year, the UCVA was 20/40 or better in 8 (57%) eyes, and the BSCVA was 20/40 or better in all eyes. Mean central corneal thickness was 749 +/- 35 microm before PRK and 621 +/- 56 mum at 3 years. During the follow-up period, haze (grade no more than 1.0) was observed in 2 eyes. No immune rejection episode or recurrent keratoconus was found.
CONCLUSIONS: PRK appears to be reliable and safe for the correction of residual ametropia after EP for keratoconus, and the visual acuity can remain stable after PRK for a long time.