MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010527

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2012

The bihemispheric posterior interior cerebellar artery: anatomic variations and clinical relevance in 11 cases.

Carlson Andrew P, Alaraj Ali, Dashti Reza, Aletich Victor A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Although the anatomic course of the posterior interior cerebellar artery (PICA) is variable, it is thought to be very rare for the artery to cross midline, with an estimated incidence of 0.1%. Bihemispheric PICA crosses midline and typically serves both PICA territories.

METHODS

We present 11 cases of bihemispheric PICA discovered from retrospective angiogram review, the largest to date reported in the literature.

RESULTS

Five cases were the typical bihemispheric PICA pattern, three were bihemispheric with distal vertebral hypoplasia, two cases were the vermian type, and one was atypical, with the PICA feeding a contralateral cerebellar arteriovenous malformation (AVM). The branching point to the contralateral hemisphere always occurred distal to the ascending tonsillar loop and all true bihemispheric variants had contralateral PICA aplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

The true incidence of this variant may be much higher than previously thought (3.6% in the current series), and has relevance for cerebrovascular disease, including aneurysm, AVM, and ischemic stroke. Neuroradiologists, neurologists, and neurosurgeons should be aware of this potential variant.

Для цитирования: Carlson Andrew P, Alaraj Ali, Dashti Reza, Aletich Victor A. The bihemispheric posterior interior cerebellar artery: anatomic variations and clinical relevance in 11 cases.. Journal of neurointerventional surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010527.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.