MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0974-2077.197075

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery · 2016

Papular Acne Scars of the Nose and Chin: An Under-recognised Variant of Acne Scarring.

Ali Faisal R, Kirk Michael, Madan Vishal

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Scarring following acne vulgaris is common and can be of profound psychosocial consequence.

AIMS AND

OBJECTIVES

We have clinically noted a variant of acne scarring, overlooked by previous categorisation schemes, which we have denominated as papular acne scars of the nose and chin. We sought to characterise these novel entities further.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Initially, we identified 14 patients with papular acne scars of the nose and chin in a cosmetic dermatology clinic, of whom two were female and rest were male. We then prospectively evaluated 100 consecutive patients attending our tertiary referral acne isotretinoin clinic and 49 patients attending a general dermatology clinic.

RESULTS

Amongst 149 patients, from a general dermatology and tertiary acne clinic, soft papular scars were noted in four patients, distributed on the nose and chin. Three of the four patients were male, three patients had additional acne scars and the median age was 23.5.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified 18 patients with papular acne scars of the nose and chin and propose that this new category should be added to acne scarring classification schemes. Future work should be directed at corroborating the epidemiology of such lesions and describing effective treatment modalities.

Для цитирования: Ali Faisal R, Kirk Michael, Madan Vishal. Papular Acne Scars of the Nose and Chin: An Under-recognised Variant of Acne Scarring.. Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.4103/0974-2077.197075.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.