MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.02.023

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2016

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Head Trauma.

Shetty Vilaas S, Reis Martin N, Aulino Joseph M, Berger Kevin L, Broder Joshua, Choudhri Asim F, Kendi A Tuba, Kessler Marcus M, Kirsch Claudia F, Luttrull Michael D, Mechtler Laszlo L, Prall J Adair, Raksin Patricia B, Roth Christopher J, Sharma Aseem, West O Clark, Wintermark Max, Cornelius Rebecca S, Bykowski Julie

СтатьяКлинические рекомендацииПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Neuroimaging plays an important role in the management of head trauma. Several guidelines have been published for identifying which patients can avoid neuroimaging. Noncontrast head CT is the most appropriate initial examination in patients with minor or mild acute closed head injury who require neuroimaging as well as patients with moderate to severe acute closed head injury. In short-term follow-up neuroimaging of acute traumatic brain injury, CT and MRI may have complementary roles. In subacute to chronic traumatic brain injury, MRI is the most appropriate initial examination, though CT may have a complementary role in select circumstances. Advanced neuroimaging techniques are areas of active research but are not considered routine clinical practice at this time. In suspected intracranial vascular injury, CT angiography or venography or MR angiography or venography is the most appropriate imaging study. In suspected posttraumatic cerebrospinal fluid leak, high-resolution noncontrast skull base CT is the most appropriate initial imaging study to identify the source, with cisternography reserved for problem solving. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every three years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Для цитирования: Shetty Vilaas S, Reis Martin N, Aulino Joseph M, Berger Kevin L, Broder Joshua, Choudhri Asim F, Kendi A Tuba, Kessler Marcus M, Kirsch Claudia F, Luttrull Michael D, Mechtler Laszlo L, Prall J Adair, Raksin Patricia B, Roth Christopher J, Sharma Aseem, West O Clark, Wintermark Max, Cornelius Rebecca S, Bykowski Julie. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Head Trauma.. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.02.023.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.