Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Approach in Pituitary Surgery.

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and complications of endoscopic and microscopic transsphenoidal surgery in the treatment of pituitary adenomas. A total of 105 follow-up cases including 60 in endoscopic surgery and 45 in microscopic surgery were treated in our hospital between January 2012 and November 2014. The endoscopic approach had a higher rate of gross tumor removal (81.7% versus 62.2%, P < 0.05) as well as a lower rate of postoperative complications (18.3% versus 35.6%, P < 0.05) than that in the microscopic group. There was no significant difference in the rates of visual improvement and cerebrospinal fluid leak between endoscopic group and microscopic group (P > 0.05). The length of the operation was longer (175 ± 25 minutes versus 110 ± 17 minutes, P < 0.05) but the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (5.1 ± 0.7 versus 7.8 ± 0.8 days, P < 0.05) for the endoscopic surgery group compared with microscopic surgery group. Endoscopic approach provides a wide surgical field and broad lateral vision making easier distinction of tumor tissue. The results of this study support the safety and short-term efficacy of endoscopic pituitary surgery.