MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2147/opth.s460454

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024

Telemedicine at a University Ophthalmology Practice During the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Oganov Anthony C, Chou Timothy Y, Hanson Paris M, Abazari Azin, Kung Preston, Weissbart Sarah B, Lenoci Jacqueline N, Honkanen Robert A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The aim of the research was to evaluate the use of teleophthalmology at a university practice during the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically examining precision, effectiveness, and patient satisfaction.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Telemedicine visits were offered to new and established patients requesting appointments with the Stony Brook University Department of Ophthalmology between March 30 and June 2, 2020. Records from these visits were reviewed for chief complaint, past medical and ocular history, diagnoses, treatment/management, and providers' sub-specialty. Precision was determined by comparing agreement between diagnoses of the telemedicine visit with those of the subsequent in-person visit. The decision to follow up in person was made by the physician and patient. Diagnostic precision as well as progression, improvement, or stability of patients' symptoms were determined by the physician's assessment at follow-up visits. Post-telemedicine visit satisfaction surveys were sent to all patients.

RESULTS

Telemedicine visits were offered to 783 patients, 520 (66.4%) of whom accepted. Of these 520 patients, 409 (78.7%) were established and 105 (20.2%) had in-person, follow-up visits. Overall, the diagnostic precision of the follow-up visits was 89.5%. Precision differed significantly across ophthalmologic subspecialties. Of the patients who had in-person follow-up visits, 56.8% remained stable, 32.4% improved, and 10.8% worsened. Established patients presented with more extensive ocular histories/procedures and experienced a higher percentage of worsening symptoms/disease stage compared to new patients. Oculoplastics/orbit was the most prevalent diagnostic subspecialty that worsened. Surveys were sent to all patients completing telemedicine visits, 15.0% of whom responded. Overall satisfaction was 91.9%, although only 23.0% of respondents preferred telemedicine to an in-office visit.

CONCLUSION

Telehealth provides high levels of precision and patient satisfaction for a wide range of ophthalmologic visits, although most patients still prefer in-office examinations. Employing teleophthalmology for follow-up and emergency care may provide patients with an effective alternative during pandemic situations and beyond.

Для цитирования: Oganov Anthony C, Chou Timothy Y, Hanson Paris M, Abazari Azin, Kung Preston, Weissbart Sarah B, Lenoci Jacqueline N, Honkanen Robert A. Telemedicine at a University Ophthalmology Practice During the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic.. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.). 2024. DOI: 10.2147/opth.s460454.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.