DOI 10.1097/00061198-200404000-00006
Relationship between indices of Humphrey perimetry and Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry in glaucoma.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To study whether the correlation between indices of Humphrey perimetry and Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimetry differs in the early and later stages of glaucoma.
METHODS
This study included 200 eyes of 200 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or normal-tension glaucoma. The eyes were classified into the early and later stages by the median value (-4.51 dB) (Classification 1; n = 100 and 100, respectively) or the average value of the maximum and minimum values (-11.90 dB) (Classification 2; n = 165 and 35, respectively) of mean deviation (MD) obtained from a set of measurements with the Humphrey Full-Threshold 30-2 program in all eyes. The correlation between MD (H-MD) or pattern standard deviation (PSD) (H-PSD), as obtained from another set of measurements with the Humphrey Full-Threshold 30-2 program, and MD (F-MD) or PSD (F-PSD), as calculated by the Full-Threshold N-30 program of FDT perimetry, were evaluated using linear regression analysis.
RESULTS
Overall, H-MD and H-PSD significantly correlated with F-MD (r = 0.713; P < 0.001) and F-PSD (r = 0.731; P < 0.001), respectively. In each of Classifications 1 and 2, H-MD and H-PSD significantly correlated with F-MD and F-PSD, respectively, both in the early and later stages. However, in each classification, the correlation between H-MD and F-MD differed significantly between the two stages (Classification 1; P < 0.001; Classification 2, P = 0.003), while the correlation between H-PSD and F-PSD did not differ significantly between the two stages.
CONCLUSION
The degree of correlation between H-MD and F-MD differed between the early and later stages of glaucoma.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.