MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The International journal of prosthodontics · 2007

Patterns of missing teeth in a population of oligodontia patients.

Créton Marijn A, Cune Marco S, Verhoeven Willem, Meijer Gert J

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to characterize a population of oligodontia patients and identify patterns of tooth agenesis.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A total of 116 patients with nonsyndromic oligodontia were studied, and the Tooth Agenesis Code (TAC) per quadrant was calculated. Oligodontia was defined as the congenital absence of 6 or more permanent teeth, excluding the third molars. The TAC is a unique number, consistent with a specific pattern of tooth agenesis. The authors suggest the use of an overall TAC with which the dentition throughout the mouth can be presented by a single number. Frequency analysis was used to study the prevalence of various patterns.

RESULTS

There was a great diversity of TACs. In the maxilla, agenesis of both premolars and the lateral incisor or the presence of only the central incisor and first molar were the most common patterns. In the mandible, agenesis of the second premolar or both premolars occurred most frequently.

CONCLUSIONS

No single pattern of agenesis occurred more than twice when the full mouth was viewed. Hence, the presentation of the dentition in oligodontia is very heterogeneous. Evaluation of treatment strategies in oligodontia patients is a methodologic challenge because homogenous, comparable subgroups of patients are not available.

Для цитирования: Créton Marijn A, Cune Marco S, Verhoeven Willem, Meijer Gert J. Patterns of missing teeth in a population of oligodontia patients.. The International journal of prosthodontics. 2007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.