MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Kathmandu University medical journal (KUMJ) · 2005

Detection and co-ordinated care management of chronic kidney disease at Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital.

Adhikary L, Simkhada R

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to analyze the detection parameters, categorization and co-ordinated management of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). The presenting clinical features, common lab investigations, applied treatment protocols and noticed complications were recorded.

METHODOLOGY: A total of 40 patients of various stages of CKD on the basis of National Kidney Foundation (NKF), Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) guideline were included in the study.

RESULT: Out of them 24(60%) were males and 16(40%) were females. Constitutional symptoms like anorexia, nausea and generalized weakness were common presenting complaints present in 37(92.5%) patients and were associated with features of anaemia, metabolic acidosis and fluid overload in stage 5 CKD patients. The average age of presentation was 51.3 years. Among 40 patients 21(52.5%) were managed conservatively, 17((42.5%) were advised for Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) through dialysis.2 (5%) patient expired during the treatment. The average duration of hospital stay was 5.6 days. Diabetes Mellitus was the most common cause 18 (45%), followed by Hypertension 14 (35%) and Chronic Glomerulonephritis (CGN) 5 (12.5%) leading to CKD. The patients were advised for regular follow up at Nephrology clinic.

Для цитирования: Adhikary L, Simkhada R. Detection and co-ordinated care management of chronic kidney disease at Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital.. Kathmandu University medical journal (KUMJ). 2005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.