MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0960327115601760

Медицинская библиотека · Human & experimental toxicology · 2015

Skin sensitization: Implications for integration of clinical data into hazard identification and risk assessment.

Basketter D A, White I R, McFadden J P, Kimber I

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Skin sensitization associated with allergic contact dermatitis is a common health problem and is an important consideration for toxicologists in safety assessment. Historically, in vivo predictive tests have been used with good success to identify substances that have the potential to induce skin sensitization, and these tests formed the basis of safety evaluation. These original tests are now being replaced gradually either by in vitro assays or by further refinements of in vivo methods such as the local lymph node assay. Human data have also been available to inform classification decisions for some substances and have been used by risk managers to introduce measures for exposure reduction. However, humans encounter hazards in the context of exposure rather than in the form of intrinsic hazards per se, and so in this article, we have examined critically the extent to which human data have been used to refine classification decisions and safety evaluations. We have also evaluated information on the burden of human allergic skin disease and used this to address the question of whether, and to what extent, the identification and evaluation of skin sensitization hazards has led to an improvement of public and/or occupational health.

Для цитирования: Basketter D A, White I R, McFadden J P, Kimber I. Skin sensitization: Implications for integration of clinical data into hazard identification and risk assessment.. Human & experimental toxicology. 2015. DOI: 10.1177/0960327115601760.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.