MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/ajad.12309

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal on addictions · 2015

Establishing an effective TMS protocol for craving in substance addiction: Is it possible?

Enokibara Mailu, Trevizol Alisson, Shiozawa Pedro, Cordeiro Quirino

СтатьяМетаанализОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive tool with known therapeutic efficacy in various neuropsychiatric disorders, such as depression, schizophrenia, mania, and anxiety disorders. We hereby, briefly present a brief review and meta-analysis on the use of TMS for craving in substance addiction.

METHODS

We present our brief review and meta-analysis following the recommendations of the Cochrane group. A total of eight randomized controlled trials fulfilled eligibility criteria and were selected. A total of 199 patients were studied.

RESULTS

We found active stimulation to be superior than sham protocols only for trials focused on right DLPFC (with Hedge's g = 1.48; ES (95%CI: 0.126-2.834), p = 0.032.

DISCUSSION AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Main meta-analysis limitations include small number of studies, high heterogeneity among studies, and high publication bias. However challenging, our exploratory analysis underscored the amelioration of craving in substance addiction for trials using high frequency TMS protocols over the right DLPFC. We hereby, propose the use of this particular TMS protocol as a promising tool in clinical research.

Для цитирования: Enokibara Mailu, Trevizol Alisson, Shiozawa Pedro, Cordeiro Quirino. Establishing an effective TMS protocol for craving in substance addiction: Is it possible?. The American journal on addictions. 2015. DOI: 10.1111/ajad.12309.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.