MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.09.044

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2012

Clinical outcomes of optimized prolate ablation and custom aspheric treatment in laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.

Kang Eui Chun, Choi Bong Joon, Kim Eung Kweon, Kim Tae-Im

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To compare visual acuity, refractive, wavefront, and visual quality outcomes between optimized prolate ablation (OPA) and optical path difference custom aspheric treatment (OPDCAT) algorithms for myopia correction.

SETTING

Private practice, Busan, South Korea.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized masked clinical trial.

METHODS

One eye of each patient was randomly selected to have laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy with the OPA algorithm and the contralateral eye with the OPDCAT algorithm. Visual acuity, manifest refraction, ocular and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), corneal asphericity (Q value), and modulation transfer function (MTF) in the 2 groups were compared 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 39 patients. The mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent at 6 months was 0.19 diopter (D) ± 0.37 (SD) in the aspheric ablation group and 0.00 ± 0.33 D in the prolate ablation group. Predictability (± 0.50 D from intended refraction) at 6 months was 82% and 100%, respectively. Twenty-six eyes (93%) in the aspheric ablation group and 27 (96%) in the prolate ablation group had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better. One eye in the aspheric ablation group and no eye in the prolate ablation group lost 1 line of corrected distance visual acuity. The prolate ablation group had fewer induced corneal and ocular spherical aberrations than the aspheric ablation group. Corneal asphericity was unchanged postoperatively in the prolate ablation group. The MTF under the correction of lower-order aberrations was higher in the prolate ablation group than in the aspheric ablation group.

CONCLUSION

The prolate ablation algorithm gave more predictable visual outcomes, induced fewer corneal HOAs, and conserved more preoperative corneal asphericity than the aspheric algorithm.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Для цитирования: Kang Eui Chun, Choi Bong Joon, Kim Eung Kweon, Kim Tae-Im. Clinical outcomes of optimized prolate ablation and custom aspheric treatment in laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.09.044.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.