Acta ophthalmologica · 2011
Combining refractive and topographic data in corneal refractive surgery for astigmatism: a new method based on polar value analysis and mathematical optimization.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Naeser Kristian
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To provide a theoretical approach for combining refractive and topographic data in the planning of corneal laser refractive surgery for astigmatism.
METHODS: Refractive and topographic data for astigmatism were transformed to the corneal plane. Net astigmatisms were converted to polar values. An optimization process was performed with the use of differential calculus.
RESULTS: With this method, the magnitude of the corneal astigmatism is reduced or unaltered, while its orientation is maintained. The method identifies the reduction in corneal astigmatism, which will yield the largest reduction in refractive astigmatic magnitude.
CONCLUSIONS: The advantage of the optimization method described in this article is a consistent reduction in corneal astigmatism towards sphericity. No new corneal astigmatism is carved on the cornea, and probably less tissue is ablated. The optimization method may also be used to combine refractive and topographic data for higher order aberrations with sinusoidal components. However, compared to the traditional purely refractive driven treatment, more refractive astigmatism will remain in the eye in most cases. A controlled clinical trial is necessary for comparing these two treatment modalities.
METHODS: Refractive and topographic data for astigmatism were transformed to the corneal plane. Net astigmatisms were converted to polar values. An optimization process was performed with the use of differential calculus.
RESULTS: With this method, the magnitude of the corneal astigmatism is reduced or unaltered, while its orientation is maintained. The method identifies the reduction in corneal astigmatism, which will yield the largest reduction in refractive astigmatic magnitude.
CONCLUSIONS: The advantage of the optimization method described in this article is a consistent reduction in corneal astigmatism towards sphericity. No new corneal astigmatism is carved on the cornea, and probably less tissue is ablated. The optimization method may also be used to combine refractive and topographic data for higher order aberrations with sinusoidal components. However, compared to the traditional purely refractive driven treatment, more refractive astigmatism will remain in the eye in most cases. A controlled clinical trial is necessary for comparing these two treatment modalities.