DOI 10.7860/jcdr/2015/10651.5373
Correlation of RAPD-PCR Profiles with ESBL Production in Clinical Isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae in Tehran.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Multidrug resistant K. pneumoniae, particularly the extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing strains, are often responsible for the failure of antibiotic treatment in nosocomial infections. Employing molecular methods to distinguish between ESBL and non-ESBL producing isolates can help quick identification of these multidrug resistant pathogens and thereby initiating appropriate antibiotic therapy. The aim of this study was to employ RAPD-PCR to distinguish the genetic fingerprints of ESBL producing clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae from ESBL negative strains.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Antibacterial susceptibility of 104 K. pneumoniae clinical isolates was determined to 13 antibacterial agents by disc diffusion. ESBL production was measured by the double disc synergy test followed by phenotypic confirmatory tests. Genetic fingerprinting was carried out by RAPD-PCR.
RESULTS
All isolates were susceptible to imipenem. Antibiotic resistance rates were: piperacillin (100%), ceftazidime (62.5%), cefotaxime (57.6%), aztreonam (52.8%), cefepime (51.9%), kanamycin (50.9%), gentamicin (41.3%), ciprofloxacin (37.5%), nitrofurantoin (30.6%), nalidixic acid (22.1%), piperacillin/tazobactam (21.1%) and amikacin (9.6%). ESBL production was observed in 14 isolates (13.4%). Genetic fingerprinting performed on 43 isolates (14 ESBL positive and 29 ESBL negative) by RAPD-PCR, showed that 46.5% of the isolates belonged to a single profile (genotype 1), of which, the majority (62.1%) were non-ESBL producers.
CONCLUSION
RAPD-PCR results showed heterogeneity among the isolates. There was no association between ESBL production with any specific genetic fingerprint.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.