MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/23337214231163385

Медицинская библиотека · Gerontology & geriatric medicine · 2023

A Pilot to Implement Chronic Care Management Services at an Academic Medical Center.

Jamshed Namirah, Miller Jessica, Rubin Craig

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Objective

Chronic Care Management (CCM) for patients requires care coordination. Our aim was to describe a pilot to implement CCM services within our house call program. We aimed to identify processes and verify reimbursement.

Design

Pilot study and retrospective review of patients participating in CCM. Setting and

Participants

Non-face-to face delivery of CCM services at an academic center. Sixty-five and over with two or more chronic conditions expected to last at least 12 month or until the death of the patient from July 15th, 2019 to June 30, 2020.

Methods

We identified patients using a registry. If consent given, a care plan was documented in the chart and shared with the patient. The nurse would then call the patient during the month to follow up on the care plan.

Results

Twenty-three patients participated. Mean age was 82 years. Majority were white (67%). One thousand sixty-six dollars ($1,066) were collected for CCM. Co-pay for traditional MCR was $8.47. Most common chronic disease diagnoses were hypertension, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, dementia with behavior and psychological disturbance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Conclusion and Implications: CCM services offer additional revenue source for practices that provide care coordination for chronic disease management.

Для цитирования: Jamshed Namirah, Miller Jessica, Rubin Craig. A Pilot to Implement Chronic Care Management Services at an Academic Medical Center.. Gerontology & geriatric medicine. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/23337214231163385.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.