Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2025
Social inclusion profiles in first episode psychosis and their links to social cognition and symptoms: A cluster analysis approach.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Murrihy Sean, Cotton Sue, Phillips Lisa, Filia Kate, Nesbitt Amy, Allott Kelly, Killackey Eóin, Watson Amity
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Many young people with first episode psychosis (FEP) experience challenges in key areas of social inclusion, including housing, finances, employment or education, and social relationships. However, there is diversity in these challenges, and it is unclear how social inclusion relates to potentially modifiable treatment factors such as social cognition. Here we aimed to identify distinct social inclusion profiles using cluster analysis and examine their associations with social cognition and other clinical factors.
METHODS: 145 young people (aged 15-25) who had experienced a FEP completed assessments of demographics, clinical symptomology, social inclusion, functioning, quality of life (QoL), and social cognition. K-means cluster analyses identified social inclusion subgroups. Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank-sum post-hoc tests were used to compare subgroups on psychosocial factors and multinomial regression models were used to examine whether social cognition was associated with the subgroups, controlling for clinical factors.
RESULTS: Three clusters emerged: low inclusion/low participation (LI-LP), moderate inclusion/low participation (MI-LP), and high inclusion/high participation (HI-HP). Social cognition was not associated with subgroup membership. LI-LP had greater depressive and less expressive negative symptoms than both other subgroups, and more severe motivation/pleasure negative symptoms than HI-HP.
CONCLUSION: Distinct FEP subgroups with varying subjective and objective social inclusion, shaped by external psychosocial and clinical factors were revealed. The findings highlight the need for holistic and personalised care to improve social inclusion for individuals with FEP and suggest that targeting depressive and motivational negative symptoms may be potential avenues to achieve this.
METHODS: 145 young people (aged 15-25) who had experienced a FEP completed assessments of demographics, clinical symptomology, social inclusion, functioning, quality of life (QoL), and social cognition. K-means cluster analyses identified social inclusion subgroups. Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank-sum post-hoc tests were used to compare subgroups on psychosocial factors and multinomial regression models were used to examine whether social cognition was associated with the subgroups, controlling for clinical factors.
RESULTS: Three clusters emerged: low inclusion/low participation (LI-LP), moderate inclusion/low participation (MI-LP), and high inclusion/high participation (HI-HP). Social cognition was not associated with subgroup membership. LI-LP had greater depressive and less expressive negative symptoms than both other subgroups, and more severe motivation/pleasure negative symptoms than HI-HP.
CONCLUSION: Distinct FEP subgroups with varying subjective and objective social inclusion, shaped by external psychosocial and clinical factors were revealed. The findings highlight the need for holistic and personalised care to improve social inclusion for individuals with FEP and suggest that targeting depressive and motivational negative symptoms may be potential avenues to achieve this.