BMC veterinary research · 2025
Survey of parasitic fauna data from wild animals through coproparasitological diagnosis in Southern Brazil.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lignon Julia Somavilla, Pinto Diego Moscarelli, Dos Santos Tamires Silva, Meireles Giulia Ribeiro, da Silveira Camila Gonçalves, Bohm Bianca Conrad, Pappen Felipe Geraldo, Monteiro Silvia Gonzalez, Soares Mauro Pereira, França Raqueli Teresinha, Bruhn Fábio Raphael Pascoti
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The proximity between people and their domestic animals with wild animal populations can result in the spread of diseases with a significant impact on public health. Infection by parasites in wildlife is considered an important bioindicator of the current state of ecosystems, and studying the epidemiology of these infections is essential for a better understanding of natural foci. However, research on parasites in southern Brazil, especially in Rio Grande do Sul (RS), is considered incipient. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to identify the parasitic fauna of wild animals in the southern region of RS through fecal parasitological diagnosis. We processed 82 fecal samples from wild animals - including birds, mammals, and reptiles - from cities within the microregion of Pelotas, using the Zinc Sulfate Centrifugal Flotation, Spontaneous Sedimentation and Oocyst Sporulation techniques.
RESULTS: In 69.5% of the samples (93.1% of mammals, 47% of birds and 50% of reptiles), we found helminth eggs and/or protozoan cysts/oocysts, with strongylid-type eggs being the most frequent parasites (44.11%). Additionally, 64.9% of the positive samples were parasitized by at least one morphogroup with zoonotic agents (Taeniidae, Capillaria, Strongyloides, Spirometra, Lagochilascaris, Sarcocystis, Trichuris, Giardia, Ancilostomid, Physaloptera, Toxocara, Fasciola). We also recorded the first finding of Monocystis spp. in a Southern tamandua (Tamandua tetradactyla).
CONCLUSIONS: Thus, it was observed that the majority of the animals were parasitized and, consequently, susceptible to a wide range of pathogens of medical and veterinary interest, highlighting the importance of these hosts in the spread of parasites, especially those with zoonotic potential. However, the ecology of transmission and the role of these hosts in the life cycles of parasites should be further explored in other studies.
RESULTS: In 69.5% of the samples (93.1% of mammals, 47% of birds and 50% of reptiles), we found helminth eggs and/or protozoan cysts/oocysts, with strongylid-type eggs being the most frequent parasites (44.11%). Additionally, 64.9% of the positive samples were parasitized by at least one morphogroup with zoonotic agents (Taeniidae, Capillaria, Strongyloides, Spirometra, Lagochilascaris, Sarcocystis, Trichuris, Giardia, Ancilostomid, Physaloptera, Toxocara, Fasciola). We also recorded the first finding of Monocystis spp. in a Southern tamandua (Tamandua tetradactyla).
CONCLUSIONS: Thus, it was observed that the majority of the animals were parasitized and, consequently, susceptible to a wide range of pathogens of medical and veterinary interest, highlighting the importance of these hosts in the spread of parasites, especially those with zoonotic potential. However, the ecology of transmission and the role of these hosts in the life cycles of parasites should be further explored in other studies.