The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2023
Three-dimensional Anatomy of the Velopharyngeal Muscles in the Cleft Palate.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhao Jiuli, Ma Hengyuan, Wang Yongqian, Song Tao, Wu Di, Yin Ningbei
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We have used micro-computed tomography (CT) to elucidate the relationship between the muscle fibers in specimens with cleft palate. These findings could be useful for muscle reconstruction in cleft palate repair and to better understand cleft palate speech.
DESIGN: Cadaveric anatomical study.
PARTICIPANTS: This study included three specimens with cleft palate.
INTERVENTION: The specimens were stained with phosphomolybdic acid and scanned by Micro-CT.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The anatomy of the muscles.
RESULTS: Using 2D projection images and 3D reconstruction models, subtle anatomical structures could be observed in the muscles. The attachment of the levator veli palatini (LVP) was not at the posterior edge of the hard palate or palatine aponeurosis (PA), but at the anterior 21.71-44.2% of the cleft edge. The palatopharyngeal (PP) was composed of two bundles: inferior and superior heads, which clasped the LVP. The uvularis was unevenly distributed, and located on both sides of the cleft edge, originating at the edge. The palatoglossus, superior constrictor of pharynx and anatomical structure around the pterygoid hamulus, were normal. The PA, PP and LVP were attached to the cleft edge from front to back, in that order. The position of the uvularis was not fixed.
CONCLUSIONS: With the help of Micro-CT technology, detailed anatomical features and the relationship between muscles could be visualized. In the specimen with cleft palate, muscles in the soft palate were associated with the pharyngeal muscles, which formed the 3D "velopharyngeal muscles complex." These findings provide anatomical evidence for muscle reconstruction in cleft palate repair.
DESIGN: Cadaveric anatomical study.
PARTICIPANTS: This study included three specimens with cleft palate.
INTERVENTION: The specimens were stained with phosphomolybdic acid and scanned by Micro-CT.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The anatomy of the muscles.
RESULTS: Using 2D projection images and 3D reconstruction models, subtle anatomical structures could be observed in the muscles. The attachment of the levator veli palatini (LVP) was not at the posterior edge of the hard palate or palatine aponeurosis (PA), but at the anterior 21.71-44.2% of the cleft edge. The palatopharyngeal (PP) was composed of two bundles: inferior and superior heads, which clasped the LVP. The uvularis was unevenly distributed, and located on both sides of the cleft edge, originating at the edge. The palatoglossus, superior constrictor of pharynx and anatomical structure around the pterygoid hamulus, were normal. The PA, PP and LVP were attached to the cleft edge from front to back, in that order. The position of the uvularis was not fixed.
CONCLUSIONS: With the help of Micro-CT technology, detailed anatomical features and the relationship between muscles could be visualized. In the specimen with cleft palate, muscles in the soft palate were associated with the pharyngeal muscles, which formed the 3D "velopharyngeal muscles complex." These findings provide anatomical evidence for muscle reconstruction in cleft palate repair.