Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 1993
Ability to achieve gain/frequency response and SSPL-90 under three prescription formulas with in-the-ear hearing aids.
СтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sammeth C A, Peek B F, Bratt G W, Bess F H, Amberg S M
Аннотация
Custom in-the-ear (ITE) hearing aids (standard linear amplifiers with single-pole-filter low-frequency tone control and a class A amplifier output stage) were fit to 90 ears using the revised National Acoustics Laboratories' formula (NAL-R), and to 20 ears each using Prescription of Gain/Output II (POGO II) and Memphis State University (MSU) formulas. Both real-ear insertion gain and 2-cc coupler gain were evaluated. Examination of differences between prescribed gain and that actually achieved in the fittings revealed that too much gain was often given in the low- and mid-frequency range and insufficient gain in the high frequencies. There was little difference among the formulas in the degree of deviation from target. For some fittings, the deviation resulted in poorer predicted speech recognition scores (modified Speech Transmission Index). For the POGO II and MSU methods, underfitting of prescribed SSPL-90 values was far more common than overfitting.