DOI 10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107243
Systematic review of co-culture methods for studying vaginal biofilm formation in bacterial vaginosis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is characterized by depletion of Lactobacillus spp. and increased abundance of facultative and strict anaerobic species. Gardnerella spp. initiates biofilm formation associated with BV pathogenesis. Vaginal biofilms act as virulence factors and reduce the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment for BV.
OBJECTIVES
To systematically review the most commonly used methodologies for studying bacterial biofilms in bacterial vaginosis (BV), and to discuss how standardization can improve future studies.
METHODS
A search was conducted in PubMed, Virtual Health Library (VHL), and Embase databases for articles addressing BV biofilms in vaginal dysbiosis, resulting in 66 included studies. Non-original studies, those involving bacteria unrelated to the vaginal environment, fungal species, and studies whose methods did not include bacterial biofilm models were excluded. The risk of bias in the selected articles was assessed using the RobDEMAT tool for in vitro studies and the RoB2 tool for in vivo studies.
RESULTS
The most commonly used method for biofilm experiments was the co-culture of Gardnerella vaginalis and Lactobacillus spp. Molecular-based studies consistently demonstrate the polymicrobial nature of vaginal biofilms, reinforcing the importance of utilizing co-culture assays with multiple bacterial species related to BV.
CONCLUSIONS
Standardizing bacterial co-culture models will allow that data from future studies to be reproducible and comparable. This will optimize time and resources in the search for novel treatments for BV, including testing for prebiotic and probiotic candidates.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.