Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2019
No impact of sports practice before or after atrial fibrillation ablation on procedure efficacy in athletes: a case-control study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Decroocq Marie, Ninni Sandro, Klein Cédric, Machuron François, Verbrugge Eric, Klug Didier, Brigadeau François, Lacroix Dominique
Аннотация
AIMS: Limited data exist on the efficacy of catheter ablation (CA) for sport-related atrial fibrillation (AF). Impact of sports practice resumption post-CA remains unknown. We aimed to determine AF CA efficacy in athletes vs. non-athletes, and to assess the impact of sport practice resumption.
METHODS AND RESULTS: From 1153 first-time AF CA performed between 2009 and 2017, 73 athletes were matched with 73 sedentary patients based on age, sex, and closest CA procedure date. Athletes were defined as performing ≥6 h/week of vigorous sports to achieve ≥2000 h accumulated lifetime sports activity. They were mostly males (93.2%) with a mean age of 55 ± 9.8 years. Before CA, athletes practiced 10.2 ± 3.9 h/week of vigorous exercise vs. 4.6 ± 3.4 after CA. Within first year after CA, physical activity was stopped in 12 (16.4%) athletes, lowered in 45 (61.9%), and resumed at same intensity in 16 (21.9%). Athletes and non-athletes suffered from same AF recurrence rates during 5-year follow-up after CA: 38 (52.0%) vs. 35 (47.9%), respectively [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) on age, body mass index (BMI), obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 1.17 (0.70-1.97, P = 0.54)]. No significant impact of physical activity resumption status was found regarding AF recurrence rates at 1-year and beyond (P = 0.60). Procedure effectiveness was significantly lower in athletes with non-paroxysmal AF [adjusted on age, BMI, reduced LVEF, and OSA HR 2.36 (confidence interval 1.19-4.70), P = 0.01].
CONCLUSION: Sports practice before and after CA has no significant impact on AF recurrence rates in athletes within 5-year after AF CA.
METHODS AND RESULTS: From 1153 first-time AF CA performed between 2009 and 2017, 73 athletes were matched with 73 sedentary patients based on age, sex, and closest CA procedure date. Athletes were defined as performing ≥6 h/week of vigorous sports to achieve ≥2000 h accumulated lifetime sports activity. They were mostly males (93.2%) with a mean age of 55 ± 9.8 years. Before CA, athletes practiced 10.2 ± 3.9 h/week of vigorous exercise vs. 4.6 ± 3.4 after CA. Within first year after CA, physical activity was stopped in 12 (16.4%) athletes, lowered in 45 (61.9%), and resumed at same intensity in 16 (21.9%). Athletes and non-athletes suffered from same AF recurrence rates during 5-year follow-up after CA: 38 (52.0%) vs. 35 (47.9%), respectively [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) on age, body mass index (BMI), obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 1.17 (0.70-1.97, P = 0.54)]. No significant impact of physical activity resumption status was found regarding AF recurrence rates at 1-year and beyond (P = 0.60). Procedure effectiveness was significantly lower in athletes with non-paroxysmal AF [adjusted on age, BMI, reduced LVEF, and OSA HR 2.36 (confidence interval 1.19-4.70), P = 0.01].
CONCLUSION: Sports practice before and after CA has no significant impact on AF recurrence rates in athletes within 5-year after AF CA.