MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0022215119000240

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2019

Rhinological interventions for obstructive sleep apnoea - a systematic review and descriptive meta-analysis.

Sharma S, Wormald J C R, Fishman J M, Andrews P, Kotecha B T

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Obstructive sleep apnoea is a common chronic sleep disorder characterised by collapse of the upper airway during sleep. The nasal airway forms a significant part of the upper airway and any obstruction is thought to have an impact on obstructive sleep apnoea. A systematic review was performed to determine the role of rhinological surgical interventions in the management of obstructive sleep apnoea.

METHODS

A systematic review of current literature was undertaken; studies were included if they involved comparison of a non-surgical and/or non-rhinological surgical intervention with a rhinological surgical intervention for treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies met the selection criteria. The pooled data suggest that there are reductions in the apnoea/hypopnea index and respiratory disturbance index following nasal surgery. However, the current body of studies is too heterogeneous for statistically significant meta-analysis to be conducted.

CONCLUSION

Nasal surgery may have limited benefit for a subset of patients based on current evidence.

Для цитирования: Sharma S, Wormald J C R, Fishman J M, Andrews P, Kotecha B T. Rhinological interventions for obstructive sleep apnoea - a systematic review and descriptive meta-analysis.. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2019. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215119000240.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.