MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.07.411

Медицинская библиотека · HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2024

'IHPBA-APHPBA clinical practice guidelines': international Delphi consensus recommendations for gallbladder cancer.

IHPBA-APHPBA International Study Group of Gallbladder Cancer, Palepu Jagannath, Endo Itaru, Chaudhari Vikram Anil, Murthy G V S, Chaudhuri Sirshendu, Adam Rene, Smith Martin, de Reuver Philip R, Lendoire Javier, Shrikhande Shailesh V, De Aretxabala Xabier, Sirohi Bhawna, Kokudo Norihiro, Kwon Wooil, Pal Sujoy, Bouzid Chafik, Dixon Elijah, Shah Sudeep Rohit, Maroni Rodrigo, Nervi Bruno, Mengoa Claudio, Patil Shekhar, Ebata Tomoki, Maithel Shishir K, Lang Hauke, Primrose John, Hirano Satoshi, Guevara Oscar A, Ohtsuka Masayuki, Valle Juan W, Sharma Atul, Nagarajan Ganesh, Núñez Ju Juan Jose, Arroyo Gerardo Francisco, Torrez Sergio Lopez, Erdmann Joris Ivo, Butte Jean M, Furuse Junji, Lee Seung Eun, Gomes António Pedro, Park Sang-Jae, Jang Jin-Young, Oddi Ricardo, Barreto Savio George, Kijima Hiroshi, Ciacio Oriana, Gowda Nagesh S, Jarnagin William

СтатьяКлинические рекомендацииПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The Delphi consensus study was carried out under the auspices of the International and Asia-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Associations (IHPBA-APHPBA) to develop practice guidelines for management of gallbladder cancer (GBC) globally.

METHOD: GBC experts from 17 countries, spanning 6 continents, participated in a hybrid four-round Delphi consensus development process. The methodology involved email, online consultations, and in-person discussions. Sixty eight clinical questions (CQs) covering various domains related to GBC, were administered to the experts. A consensus recommendation was accepted only when endorsed by more than 75% of the participating experts.

RESULTS

Out of the sixty experts invited initially to participate in the consensus process 45 (75%) responded to the invitation. The consensus was achieved in 92.6% (63/68) of the CQs. Consensus covers epidemiological aspects of GBC, early, incidental and advanced GBC management, definitions for radical GBC resections, the extent of liver resection, lymph node dissection, and definitions of borderline resectable and locally advanced GBC.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first international Delphi consensus on GBC. These recommendations provide uniform terminology and practical clinical guidelines on the current management of GBC. Unresolved contentious issues like borderline resectable/locally advanced GBC need to be addressed by future clinical studies.

Для цитирования: IHPBA-APHPBA International Study Group of Gallbladder Cancer, Palepu Jagannath, Endo Itaru, Chaudhari Vikram Anil, Murthy G V S, Chaudhuri Sirshendu, Adam Rene, Smith Martin, de Reuver Philip R, Lendoire Javier, Shrikhande Shailesh V, De Aretxabala Xabier, Sirohi Bhawna, Kokudo Norihiro, Kwon Wooil, Pal Sujoy, Bouzid Chafik, Dixon Elijah, Shah Sudeep Rohit, Maroni Rodrigo, Nervi Bruno, Mengoa Claudio, Patil Shekhar, Ebata Tomoki, Maithel Shishir K, Lang Hauke, Primrose John, Hirano Satoshi, Guevara Oscar A, Ohtsuka Masayuki, Valle Juan W, Sharma Atul, Nagarajan Ganesh, Núñez Ju Juan Jose, Arroyo Gerardo Francisco, Torrez Sergio Lopez, Erdmann Joris Ivo, Butte Jean M, Furuse Junji, Lee Seung Eun, Gomes António Pedro, Park Sang-Jae, Jang Jin-Young, Oddi Ricardo, Barreto Savio George, Kijima Hiroshi, Ciacio Oriana, Gowda Nagesh S, Jarnagin William. 'IHPBA-APHPBA clinical practice guidelines': international Delphi consensus recommendations for gallbladder cancer.. HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.07.411.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.