MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2024.05.045

Медицинская библиотека · Surgery · 2024

IRON: A retrospective international multicenter study on robotic versus laparoscopic versus open approach in gallbladder cancer.

Ielpo Benedetto, Vittoria d'Addetta Maria, Cremona Simone, Podda Mauro, Di Martino Marcello, Di Franco Gregorio, Furbetta Niccoló, Comandatore Annalisa, Giulianotti Pier Cristoforo, Morelli Luca, IRON Study Collaborative Group

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

For patients with T1b gallbladder cancer or greater, an adequate lymphadenectomy should include at least 6 nodes. Studies comparing short- and long-term outcomes of the open approach with those of laparoscopy and robotic approaches are limited, with small sample sizes, and there are none comparing laparoscopic and robotic approaches. This study compared patients who underwent robotic, laparoscopic, and open resection of gallbladder cancer, evaluating short- and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of patients with T1b gallbladder cancer or greater (excluding combined organ resection and T4) who underwent open, laparoscopic, and robotic liver resection and lymphadenectomy between January 2012 and December 2022. The 3 groups were matched in terms of patient baseline and disease characteristics based on propensity score matching, comparing robotic with open and robotic with laparoscopic groups.

RESULTS

We enrolled 575 patients from 37 institutions. After propensity score matching, the median number of harvested nodes was higher in the robotic group than in the open (7 vs 5; P = .0150) and laparoscopic groups (7 vs 4; P < .001). The Pringle maneuver time was shorter with robotic resection than with laparoscopy (38 vs 59 minutes; P = .0034), and the robotic group also had a lower conversion rate (3% vs 14%, respectively; P = .005) and less estimated blood loss than open and laparoscopic resections. The perioperative morbidity and mortality rates did not differ. The robotic and laparoscopic approaches were associated with faster functional recovery than the open group. In the multivariate analysis, the factors related to the retrieval of at least 6 nodes were the robotic approach over open (odds ratio, 5.1529) and over laparoscopy (odds ratio, 6.7289) and the center experience (≥20 minimally invasive liver resections/year) (odds ratio, 4.962). After a mean follow-up of 42.6 months, overall survival and disease-free survival were not different between groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with open and laparoscopic surgeries, the robotic approach for gallbladder cancer performed in a center with appropriate experience in minimally invasive surgery can provide adequate node retrieval.

Для цитирования: Ielpo Benedetto, Vittoria d'Addetta Maria, Cremona Simone, Podda Mauro, Di Martino Marcello, Di Franco Gregorio, Furbetta Niccoló, Comandatore Annalisa, Giulianotti Pier Cristoforo, Morelli Luca, IRON Study Collaborative Group. IRON: A retrospective international multicenter study on robotic versus laparoscopic versus open approach in gallbladder cancer.. Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.05.045.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.