MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.waojou.2026.101341

Медицинская библиотека · The World Allergy Organization journal · 2026

Efficacy and safety of olopatadine-mometasone combination nasal spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Sima Yutong, Wang Xueyan, Zhang Tao, Cao Zhiwei, Chen Wei, Quan Fang, Ren Xiaoyong, Yang Yi, Bao Shiping, Xie Lifeng, Zhao Changqing, Zhang Qinna, Xing Zhimin, Zhou Huifang, Chen Jianjun, Hua Qingquan, Zhou Ling, Zhang Xiaobing, Chen Xiong, Li Chao, Ma Ruixia, Zhang Hua, Xu Zhendong, Han Mei, Wang Xiangdong, Zhang Luo

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Patients with moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis (AR) often experience a heavy clinical burden and require more medications to alleviate nasal symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GSP301, a fixed-dose combination nasal spray containing olopatadine hydrochloride and mometasone furoate, in patients with seasonal AR (SAR).

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, moderate-to-severe SAR patients were assigned at a 1:1:1 ratio to receive intranasal GSP301, olopatadine hydrochloride (OLO), or mometasone furoate (MF) for 14 days. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the average A.M. and P.M. 12-hour reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS). Secondary endpoints included changes in the instantaneous TNSS (iTNSS), individual nasal symptoms, reflective total ocular symptom score (rTOSS), instantaneous total ocular symptom score (iTOSS), individual ocular symptoms, and rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life questionnaire (RQLQ). Exploratory endpoints and adverse events were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 534 subjects, the GSP301 group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in the average rTNSS compared with the OLO group [posterior least square mean difference (LSMD) = -0.56; P < 0.0001] and the MF group (posterior LSMD = -0.43; P < 0.0001). Consistent benefits were observed across secondary endpoints, including iTNSS, rTOSS, RQLQ, and individual nasal and ocular symptoms (all P < 0.05). Additionally, GSP301 reduced the levels of interleukin (IL)-5 and eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) in nasal secretions. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 11.2%, 13.5%, and 11.3% of patients in the GSP301, OLO, and MF groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared with OLO and MF, GSP301 demonstrated superior efficacy, safety, and potential advantages in alleviating local inflammation in patients with moderate-to-severe SAR.

Для цитирования: Sima Yutong, Wang Xueyan, Zhang Tao, Cao Zhiwei, Chen Wei, Quan Fang, Ren Xiaoyong, Yang Yi, Bao Shiping, Xie Lifeng, Zhao Changqing, Zhang Qinna, Xing Zhimin, Zhou Huifang, Chen Jianjun, Hua Qingquan, Zhou Ling, Zhang Xiaobing, Chen Xiong, Li Chao, Ma Ruixia, Zhang Hua, Xu Zhendong, Han Mei, Wang Xiangdong, Zhang Luo. Efficacy and safety of olopatadine-mometasone combination nasal spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.. The World Allergy Organization journal. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2026.101341.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.