Comparing the outcome of monitored anaesthesia care and local anaesthesia for carpal tunnel syndrome surgery by neurosurgeons.

INTRODUCTION

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the commonest median nerve entrapment neuropathy of the hand, up to 90% of all nerve compression syndromes. The disease is often treated with conservative measures or surgery. The senior author initially intended to treat his own neurosurgical patients concurrently diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome in 2014, subsequently, he began to pick up more referrals from the primary healthcare group over the years. This has led to the setup of a peripheral and spine clinic to act as a hub of referrals.

OBJECTIVE

Department of Neurosurgery Sarawak aimed to evaluate the surgical outcome of carpal tunnel release done over five years.

METHODS

The carpal tunnel surgeries were done under local anaesthesia (LA) given by neurosurgeons (Bupivacaine 0.5% or Lignocaine 2%). Monitored anaesthesia care (MAC) was later introduced by our hospital neuroanaesthetist in the beginning of 2018 (Target-controlled infusion propofol and boluses of fentanyl). We looked into our first 17 cases and compared these to the two anaesthesia techniques (LA versus MAC + LA) in terms of patient's pain score based on visual analogue scale (VAS).

RESULTS

Result showed MAC provided excellent pain control during and immediately after the surgery. None experienced anaesthesia complications. There was no difference in pain control at post-operation one month. Both techniques had equal good clinical outcome during patients' clinic follow up.

CONCLUSION

Neurosurgeons provide alternative route for CTS patients to receive surgical treatment. Being a designated pain free hospital, anaesthetist collaboration in carpal tunnel surgery is an added value and improves patients overall experience and satisfaction.