MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fonc.2025.1597024

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in oncology · 2026

Multimodal imaging findings of primary renal well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoid): a case report and literature review.

Wei Bangcheng, Chen Yuge, Chen Yueqin, Zhang Shujun

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Primary renal well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare. Due to their non-specific nature, the detection and monitoring of NETs remain highly challenging. Here, we report a case of a 45-year-old man who was admitted after an incidental finding of a space-occupying lesion in the kidney during a routine physical examination. The patient underwent CT and MRI multimodal imaging, followed by pathological and immunohistochemical analysis after surgery, leading to a diagnosis of well-differentiated renal NET. He was subsequently followed up for a long period. A review of the literature, in conjunction with this case, revealed that these tumors present with non-specific clinical and imaging features. Diagnosis primarily relies on pathological and immunohistochemical evaluation. Well-differentiated renal neuroendocrine tumors are associated with low malignant potential and a favorable prognosis. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice, and long-term follow-up is essential to monitor the patient's condition. By combining this case with existing literature, we aim to provide valuable insights for clinicians in the diagnosis and management of renal NETs.

Для цитирования: Wei Bangcheng, Chen Yuge, Chen Yueqin, Zhang Shujun. Multimodal imaging findings of primary renal well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoid): a case report and literature review.. Frontiers in oncology. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1597024.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.