The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025
Characterization of ertapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in Canadian hospitals: 17 years of the CANWARD study (2007-23).
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mataseje Laura F, Lerminiaux Nicole, Lagacé-Wiens Philippe, Walkty Andrew, Adam Heather J, Poutanen Susan, Baxter Melanie, Karlowsky James A, McCracken Melissa, Golding George R, Zhanel George G
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To review phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of ertapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates identified by the CANWARD study from 2007 to 2023.
METHODS: Bacterial isolates were collected as part of the CANWARD surveillance study from 2007 to 2023. CLSI M7 broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing (12th edition, 2024) was performed. MICs were interpreted by CLSI M100 breakpoints (34th edition, 2024). WGS was performed to identify antimicrobial resistance markers.
RESULTS: Only 134 (0.7%) of the 19 642 Enterobacterales were ertapenem-resistant. Carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales (CPE) accounted for 17.9% (n = 24) of ertapenem-resistant isolates and were predominantly Klebsiella pneumoniae (54.2%) and Escherichia coli (20.8%). KPC was the most common carbapenemase identified (62.5%). K. pneumoniae ST834, ST16 and ST258, and E. coli ST131 were the most frequent STs detected. CPE percent resistant values ranged from 20.8% to 25.0% for ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. Most non-CPE ertapenem-resistant isolates were Enterobacter spp. (51.8%), E. coli (15.5%) and K. pneumoniae (10.9%). Non-CPE STs were most commonly E. cloacae ST108, ST50 and ST133, and E. coli ST131. Non-CPE percent resistant values ranged from 2.7% to 4.5% for ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. At least one of an AmpC, an ESBL or porin alternations were observed in most non-CPE isolates.
CONCLUSIONS: In Canada, ertapenem-resistant Enterobacterales remain uncommon (0.7%). CPE isolates demonstrated higher percent resistant values for multiple antimicrobial classes and harboured more antimicrobial resistance genes than non-CPE isolates. Continued monitoring for ertapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, particularly CPE, is important given their associated multidrug resistance to both established and newer agents.
METHODS: Bacterial isolates were collected as part of the CANWARD surveillance study from 2007 to 2023. CLSI M7 broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing (12th edition, 2024) was performed. MICs were interpreted by CLSI M100 breakpoints (34th edition, 2024). WGS was performed to identify antimicrobial resistance markers.
RESULTS: Only 134 (0.7%) of the 19 642 Enterobacterales were ertapenem-resistant. Carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales (CPE) accounted for 17.9% (n = 24) of ertapenem-resistant isolates and were predominantly Klebsiella pneumoniae (54.2%) and Escherichia coli (20.8%). KPC was the most common carbapenemase identified (62.5%). K. pneumoniae ST834, ST16 and ST258, and E. coli ST131 were the most frequent STs detected. CPE percent resistant values ranged from 20.8% to 25.0% for ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. Most non-CPE ertapenem-resistant isolates were Enterobacter spp. (51.8%), E. coli (15.5%) and K. pneumoniae (10.9%). Non-CPE STs were most commonly E. cloacae ST108, ST50 and ST133, and E. coli ST131. Non-CPE percent resistant values ranged from 2.7% to 4.5% for ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. At least one of an AmpC, an ESBL or porin alternations were observed in most non-CPE isolates.
CONCLUSIONS: In Canada, ertapenem-resistant Enterobacterales remain uncommon (0.7%). CPE isolates demonstrated higher percent resistant values for multiple antimicrobial classes and harboured more antimicrobial resistance genes than non-CPE isolates. Continued monitoring for ertapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, particularly CPE, is important given their associated multidrug resistance to both established and newer agents.