MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/micr.22507

Медицинская библиотека · Microsurgery · 2015

Combined use of anterolateral thigh flap and pharyngeal flap for reconstruction of extensive soft-palate defects.

Miyamoto Shimpei, Sakuraba Minoru, Nagamatsu Shogo, Fujiki Masahide, Fukunaga Yutaka, Hayashi Ryuichi

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Functional reconstruction of extensive soft-palate defects is challenging for microsurgeons. The versatility of the combination of a free anterolateral thigh flap and a superiorly based pharyngeal flap for oncologic soft-palate reconstruction was investigated.

METHODS

The combination of flaps was used for immediate reconstruction after total or subtotal resection of the soft palate in five consecutive patients from 2006 to 2011.

RESULTS

All flaps survived completely. Palatal fistula and miniplate infection each developed in one patient but healed conservatively. Follow-up period ranged from 21 to 66 months. All patients tolerated a regular diet without significant aspiration or nasal regurgitation. Speech intelligibility was excellent in all patients, and none required a palatal prosthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of an anterolateral thigh flap and a superiorly based pharyngeal flap is a versatile option for reconstructing extensive soft-plate defects. This method is simple and achieves reproducible results with limited donor-site morbidity. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 36:291-296, 2016.

Для цитирования: Miyamoto Shimpei, Sakuraba Minoru, Nagamatsu Shogo, Fujiki Masahide, Fukunaga Yutaka, Hayashi Ryuichi. Combined use of anterolateral thigh flap and pharyngeal flap for reconstruction of extensive soft-palate defects.. Microsurgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1002/micr.22507.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.