MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s40425-018-0318-x

Медицинская библиотека · Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2018

Inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy versus leptomeningeal disease following Ipilimumab.

Cafuir Lorraine, Lawson David, Desai Nilesh, Kesner Vita, Voloschin Alfredo

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Ipilimumab is an FDA-approved anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody used in treatment of metastatic melanoma. We present an unusual neurological complication of Ipilimumab therapy and the diagnostic dilemma it caused.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 42 year old male with Stage IV metastatic melanoma developed lower extremity weakness and sensory neuropathy following three doses of Ipilimumab. MRI of the lumbar spine was initially interpreted as diffuse leptomeningeal disease, and patient began Dexamethasone and radiation with improvement in symptoms. However, subsequent completion imaging revealed smooth nerve root involvement with sparing of the spinal cord, findings more compatible with inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. The absence of malignant cells in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and nerve conduction study (NCS) showing lumbar polyradiculoneuropathy with axonal involvement and demyelinating features supported the diagnosis of inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Later in the course of his disease, the patient developed frank leptomeningeal melanoma.

CONCLUSION

Ipilimumab immune-related toxicity presented as inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, which was difficult to distinguish from leptomeningeal disease, a common complication of melanoma.

Для цитирования: Cafuir Lorraine, Lawson David, Desai Nilesh, Kesner Vita, Voloschin Alfredo. Inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy versus leptomeningeal disease following Ipilimumab.. Journal for immunotherapy of cancer. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s40425-018-0318-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.