Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2023
Thyrotropin Receptor Autoantibody Assessment in Thyroid Eye Disease: Does the Assay Type Matter?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moledina Malik, Roos Jonathan, Murthy Rachna
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Thyroid receptor antibodies can quantify thyroid eye disease activity, predict outcomes and aid timing of interventions. The type and generation of assay is frequently unspecified, complicating meta-analyses. To determine the clinical and biochemical relationships between a second-generation thyrotropin receptor-binding inhibition antibody (TRAb) immunoassay, detecting stimulatory and blocking antibodies, with the thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) bridging immunoassay detecting the stimulatory component only.
METHODS: Retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients attending a regional specialist service. For each patient and visit, both a TRAb and TSI were performed, and a clinical activity score (CAS) recorded.
RESULTS: A significant positive correlation between TRAb and TSI (rho = 0.828, p < 0.01) but a weaker correlation between the assays and CAS (TRAb: rho = 0.439, p < 0.01; TSI: r = 0.357, p < 0.01) were found. In 10% of the episodic data, patients had a TRAb level that was disproportionately high (39.41 ± 52.84 IU/L), compared to their TSI levels (9.53 ± 12.10 IU/L) with a higher-than-average CAS (2.47 ± 1.78; range, 0-5). Within 12 months of diagnosis, a significant positive correlation between CAS and TRAb (rho = 0.503, p < 0.01) as well as between CAS and TSI (rho = 0.329, p < 0.01) were found. In patients with a diagnosis over 12 months, the correlation with CAS for both TSI and TRAb were Spearman rank correlation coefficient of 0.347 (p < 0.01) and 0.327 (p < 0.01), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: TRAb and TSI correlate strongly and to a lesser extent with the CAS. For most patients, TRAb can be replaced with the more economical TSI. TRAb also correlates better with newly diagnosed, more active patients than TSI. In a subset of patients, blocking antibodies may play a significant pathogenic role, requiring different treatment and monitoring. Further studies are required to investigate this relationship.
METHODS: Retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients attending a regional specialist service. For each patient and visit, both a TRAb and TSI were performed, and a clinical activity score (CAS) recorded.
RESULTS: A significant positive correlation between TRAb and TSI (rho = 0.828, p < 0.01) but a weaker correlation between the assays and CAS (TRAb: rho = 0.439, p < 0.01; TSI: r = 0.357, p < 0.01) were found. In 10% of the episodic data, patients had a TRAb level that was disproportionately high (39.41 ± 52.84 IU/L), compared to their TSI levels (9.53 ± 12.10 IU/L) with a higher-than-average CAS (2.47 ± 1.78; range, 0-5). Within 12 months of diagnosis, a significant positive correlation between CAS and TRAb (rho = 0.503, p < 0.01) as well as between CAS and TSI (rho = 0.329, p < 0.01) were found. In patients with a diagnosis over 12 months, the correlation with CAS for both TSI and TRAb were Spearman rank correlation coefficient of 0.347 (p < 0.01) and 0.327 (p < 0.01), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: TRAb and TSI correlate strongly and to a lesser extent with the CAS. For most patients, TRAb can be replaced with the more economical TSI. TRAb also correlates better with newly diagnosed, more active patients than TSI. In a subset of patients, blocking antibodies may play a significant pathogenic role, requiring different treatment and monitoring. Further studies are required to investigate this relationship.