Endocrine · 2023
The clinicopathological features and prognosis of silent corticotroph tumors: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vuong Huy Gia, Dunn Ian F
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Data on silent corticotroph tumor (SCT) are still heterogeneous and controversial. In this study, we aimed to compare the demographic, clinicopathological manifestations, postoperative complications, and patient outcomes of SCTs with other non-functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (NFT) and functioning corticotroph tumor (FCT) or so-called Cushing disease adenoma.
METHODS: We searched PubMed and Web of Science for data of interest. Odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD), hazard ratio (HR), and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using the random-effect model.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies with 985 SCTs were included in meta-analyses. In comparison to other NFTs, SCTs were more commonly associated with female gender, younger age, cavernous sinus invasion, apoplexy, and radiotherapy administration. Postoperatively, SCT patients were more likely to experience hypocortisolism, new-onset visual disturbances, and a higher risk for tumor progression than other NFTs. We did not find any significant differences between SCT type I and type II. Compared to FCTs, SCTs were more likely male, older age, and had larger tumor sizes. The prevalence of a USP8 mutation was significantly higher in FCT than in SCT.
CONCLUSION: SCT was demographically, clinicopathologically, and prognostically distinct from other NFTs and FCTs. These tumors should be considered high-risk; appropriate treatment decisions and more stringent follow-up should be tailored to improve patient outcomes.
METHODS: We searched PubMed and Web of Science for data of interest. Odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD), hazard ratio (HR), and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using the random-effect model.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies with 985 SCTs were included in meta-analyses. In comparison to other NFTs, SCTs were more commonly associated with female gender, younger age, cavernous sinus invasion, apoplexy, and radiotherapy administration. Postoperatively, SCT patients were more likely to experience hypocortisolism, new-onset visual disturbances, and a higher risk for tumor progression than other NFTs. We did not find any significant differences between SCT type I and type II. Compared to FCTs, SCTs were more likely male, older age, and had larger tumor sizes. The prevalence of a USP8 mutation was significantly higher in FCT than in SCT.
CONCLUSION: SCT was demographically, clinicopathologically, and prognostically distinct from other NFTs and FCTs. These tumors should be considered high-risk; appropriate treatment decisions and more stringent follow-up should be tailored to improve patient outcomes.