MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/erv.2743

Медицинская библиотека · European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2020

How do patients with eating disorders perceive and evaluate food portion sizes? A systematic review.

Dörsam Annica Franziska, Mack Isabelle, Kögel Laura, Zipfel Stephan, Giel Katrin Elisabeth

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The selection of adequate portion sizes plays a key role in the nutritional treatment of eating disorders (EDs). There is limited knowledge concerning the estimation of portion sizes in individuals with EDs.

METHOD: We performed a systematic review according to the PRISMA statement to synthesise current evidence in this field. Of N = 584 hits, four full-texts were included in the qualitative synthesis.

RESULTS

While patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) tend to overestimate the size of energy-dense food items and small to medium sized meal portions, they do not show a different estimation compared to healthy controls when judging the amount of food pieces. Large portion sizes were associated with increased anxiety in patients with AN.

DISCUSSION: The overestimation of food portion sizes seems to be driven by attitudinal and/or higher cognitive factors associated with AN. Differences between the studies are discussed and suggestions for future studies are given.

Для цитирования: Dörsam Annica Franziska, Mack Isabelle, Kögel Laura, Zipfel Stephan, Giel Katrin Elisabeth. How do patients with eating disorders perceive and evaluate food portion sizes? A systematic review.. European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association. 2020. DOI: 10.1002/erv.2743.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.