Der Nervenarzt · 2026
[Digital health applications and adherence in depression: a qualitative study from the perspective of healthcare providers].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Denby Francesca, Brenner Sophie, Schneider Brit S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Shortages of healthcare professionals and the rising prevalence of depressive disorders are creating gaps in care. When used correctly and consistently, digital health applications (DiGA) can help bridge these gaps. This study examines, from the perspective of healthcare providers, criteria for DiGA selection, their integration into therapy and the promotion of patient adherence.
METHODS: For this qualitative study eight semi-structured expert interviews were conducted with psychiatrists, psychotherapists and general practitioners in and around Osnabrück, Germany. The interviews were analyzed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis.
RESULTS: Respondents primarily use DiGA as adjunctive therapy or to bridge waiting periods. They seem particularly suitable for patients with mild symptoms, technical skills and good self-organization. Monitoring progress and integrating DiGA into therapeutic routines support continued use. Providers are only partially aware of their influence on adherence. Most respondents reported limited knowledge of the app content and a lack of confidence in the technology.
CONCLUSION: Although the effectiveness of DiGA is proven and the role of medical or therapeutic support in promoting adherence is recognized, insufficient information, a lack of transparency regarding app content and the absence of best practices are hindrances to practical implementation. To realize the full potential of DiGA providers should be supported with product-neutral, quality-assured information and practical guidance for integration into therapy.
METHODS: For this qualitative study eight semi-structured expert interviews were conducted with psychiatrists, psychotherapists and general practitioners in and around Osnabrück, Germany. The interviews were analyzed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis.
RESULTS: Respondents primarily use DiGA as adjunctive therapy or to bridge waiting periods. They seem particularly suitable for patients with mild symptoms, technical skills and good self-organization. Monitoring progress and integrating DiGA into therapeutic routines support continued use. Providers are only partially aware of their influence on adherence. Most respondents reported limited knowledge of the app content and a lack of confidence in the technology.
CONCLUSION: Although the effectiveness of DiGA is proven and the role of medical or therapeutic support in promoting adherence is recognized, insufficient information, a lack of transparency regarding app content and the absence of best practices are hindrances to practical implementation. To realize the full potential of DiGA providers should be supported with product-neutral, quality-assured information and practical guidance for integration into therapy.