MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/s-2006-951937

Медицинская библиотека · Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie · 2007

[Assessment of eating disorder psychopathology in pre-gastric banding candidates: interview or self-report questionnaire?].

Krajinovic Ljubica, Mühlhans Barbara, Horbach Thomas, Teske Viola, Hilbert Anja, de Zwaan Martina

Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The objective was to compare two methods for assessing eating disorder psychopathology in pre-gastric banding surgery patients. 93 morbidly obese patients were assessed with the German versions of the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) and the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q). The EDE and the EDE-Q were significantly correlated on the restraint, eating concern, shape concern and weight concern subscales, although the questionnaire scores were significantly higher. Frequencies of objective bulimic episodes were slightly but significantly correlated and the difference between EDE and EDE-Q was not significant. When participants were classified as binge eaters based on a cut-off of two binges per week on average in the last 28 days, the concordance between EDE and EDE-Q was moderate. The EDE-Q seems well-suited in assessing eating disorder psychopathology in obese pre-gastric banding patients. Yet, for the assessment of binge eating episodes the use of the questionnaire alone can not be recommended.

Для цитирования: Krajinovic Ljubica, Mühlhans Barbara, Horbach Thomas, Teske Viola, Hilbert Anja, de Zwaan Martina. [Assessment of eating disorder psychopathology in pre-gastric banding candidates: interview or self-report questionnaire?].. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie. 2007. DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-951937.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.