CALCIUM CREATININE CLEARANCE RATIO IS NOT HELPFUL IN DIFFERENTIATING PRIMARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM FROM FAMILIAL HERPERCALCEMIC HYPOCALCIURIA: A STUDY OF 1000 PATIENTS.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
With increasing recognition of more subtle presentations of primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT), laboratory values are frequently seen in a range that would be expected for patients who have familial hypercalcemic hypocalciuria (FHH). Calcium creatinine clearance ratio (CCCR) has been advocated as a diagnostic tool to differentiate between these two disorders. However, it is limited by an indeterminate range (0.01-0.02). The aim of this study is to assess the relevance of CCCR in a modern series of patients with surgically managed pHPT.
METHODS
We performed a retrospective cohort study of 1000 patients who underwent parathyroid surgery for pHPT over eleven years. CCCR was evaluated by degree of biochemical derangement, single versus multiple gland disease and interfering medications.
RESULTS
Patient demographics and resected histopathology were typical for a current series of patients with pHPT. In retrospect, none of the patients were suspected to have FHH post operatively. CCCR was less than 0.01 for 19.0%, between 0.01-0.02 for 43.7% and greater than 0.02 in 37.3%. Distribution of CCCR for patients free from interfering medications and different histological subtypes were the same. One third of the cohort had mild calcium elevations, more typical for FHH. Of these, almost two thirds had a CCCR in a range suspect for FHH (<0.02).
CONCLUSION
To our knowledge this is the largest series to evaluate the validity of CCCR for patients with surgically confirmed pPHT. The utility of CCCR in screening for FHH is limited, as 63% of modern patients with confirmed pHPT have low values.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.