DOI 10.1016/j.jasc.2021.03.001
Histopathologic and clinical outcomes of Milan System categories "non-diagnostic" and "non-neoplastic" of salivary gland fine needle aspirations.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) specifies six categories with estimated risks of malignancy (ROM) and suggested management. The estimated ROM is 25% for Non-Diagnostic (ND) category, and 10% for Non-Neoplastic (NN). This study aimed to investigate histopathologic and clinical outcomes of MSRSGC categories ND and NN at the authors' institution.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Cytopathology fine needle aspiration reports from 2008-2020 were searched for the word "salivary", "parotid", and "submandibular". Cases fitting Non-Diagnostic (ND) and Non-Neoplastic (NN) categories were identified. Follow-up cyto-/histopathologic and clinical data were extracted.
RESULTS
There were 43 ND and 46 NN cases. The average age was 58.3 years. Neoplastic lesions were found in 13 of 43 (30%) ND and 3 of 46 (6.5%) NN. The rate of malignancy in ND category was 14.0% (6/43) and 0% (0/46) in NN category. Four cases in ND (9.3%) and 6 (13.0%) in NN had no neoplasm and instead had an underlying reactive condition (e.g., chronic sialadenitis) or inflammatory lesion (e.g., lymphoepithelial cyst) on histologic follow-up. There was no follow-up pathology in 46.5% NDs (20/43) and 82.6% NNs (38/46); however, no lesions were apparent clinically with a mean follow-up of 3 years and 1.5 years, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
MSRSGC categories ND and NN are helpful for reporting salivary gland FNA results. With proper clinical and radiologic correlation, ROM of NN is low; however, ROM of ND remains significant. Repeat FNA after correlation for ND cases seems prudent as neoplasms and malignancies may have gone undetected.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.