MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2334/josnusd.16-0417

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of oral science · 2017

Microbiological assessment of effects of clinical mouth rinses on common oral microbes.

Ogawa Taiji, Honda-Ogawa Mariko, Ikebe Kazunori, Kawabata Shigetada, Maeda Yoshinobu

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Dry mouth occurs frequently in aged individuals, as well as in patients who are hospitalized, receiving multiple drugs, undergoing radiation treatment to the head and neck, or wearing a removable denture prosthesis, use of mouth rinse being often an option for relief. In the present study, we performed microbiological assessments of subjects given three different commercially available mouth rinses commonly employed in clinical practice (Peptisal, Biotène, ConCool) to determine their effects. For bacterial clearance in vitro, Peptisal showed the highest level of suppression of oral indigenous bacteria found in both planktonic formations and biofilm. Furthermore, the inhibitory effects of these agents on biofilm formation on acrylic resin plates were examined using scanning electron microscopy. Again, Peptisal proved superior, because acquisition of resistance to antimicrobial peptides by a sensitive microbial strain was rarely observed. We conclude that Peptisal is an effective mouth rinse for clearance of planktonic and biofilm microorganisms present in the oral cavity.

Для цитирования: Ogawa Taiji, Honda-Ogawa Mariko, Ikebe Kazunori, Kawabata Shigetada, Maeda Yoshinobu. Microbiological assessment of effects of clinical mouth rinses on common oral microbes.. Journal of oral science. 2017. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.16-0417.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.