MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2011.02.001

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of diagnostic pathology · 2011

Malacoplakia of the tongue complicating the site of irradiation for squamous cell carcinoma with review of the literature.

Kradin Richard L, Sheldon Thomas A, Nielsen Petur, Selig Martin, Hunt Jennifer

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Malacoplakia is a benign and uncommon inflammatory response that develops most frequently in the genitourinary tract but has been reported at other sites. We report the case of 67-year-old man who presented with a lesion at the base of the tongue 7 months after chemoradiation for biopsy-proven invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. The lesion showed intense avidity by positron emission tomography and was biopsied with the putative clinical diagnosis of recurrent malignancy. Histologically, the lesion showed the characteristics of malacoplakia as well as abundant intracellular gram-negative bacilli. Ultrastructural analysis revealed giant lysosomes, intracytoplasmic calcific concretions (Michaelis-Gutman bodies), and partially digested gram-negative bacilli within vacuolated lysosomes of macrophages. To our knowledge, this is the seventh reported case of malacoplakia of the tongue and the first to develop at the site of prior radiation treatment of a carcinoma. The clinical features of this case, a review of previously reported cases, and a consideration of pathogenesis are presented.

Для цитирования: Kradin Richard L, Sheldon Thomas A, Nielsen Petur, Selig Martin, Hunt Jennifer. Malacoplakia of the tongue complicating the site of irradiation for squamous cell carcinoma with review of the literature.. Annals of diagnostic pathology. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2011.02.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.