MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1521/aeap.2012.24.2.163

Медицинская библиотека · AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2012

Condom use with various types of sex partners by money boys in China.

Liu Shusen, Chen Lin, Li Li, Zhao Jin, Cai Wende, Rou Keming, Wu Zunyou, Detels Roger

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Money boys (MBs) who typically sell sex to males have not yet been extensively studied in China. In this 2009 study, 28 venue-based MBs were interviewed. We analyzed their condom use behaviors with various partners, including male and female clients, male and female casual partners, other MBs and female sex workers, and boyfriends and girlfriends. All participants were aware of the need for using condoms; however, usage with different partner types varied. The longer a relationship with a partner, the less frequent was condom use. A major reason for not using condoms was that they or their partners did not like the loss of sensation due to condom use. Other factors included sexual orientation, age, duration in commercial sex, concerns about HIV/AIDS, attractiveness of partners, and support of "mommies" (brothel supervisors). Both individual- and venue-level interventions are needed to promote condom use, and mommies need to be included in intervention strategies.

Для цитирования: Liu Shusen, Chen Lin, Li Li, Zhao Jin, Cai Wende, Rou Keming, Wu Zunyou, Detels Roger. Condom use with various types of sex partners by money boys in China.. AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education. 2012. DOI: 10.1521/aeap.2012.24.2.163.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.