MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jns.2018.12.003

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the neurological sciences · 2018

Electrodiagnostic consultations in Zambia: Referral characteristics and neuromuscular disorders.

Kvalsund Michelle, Mukomena Patrice, Chidumayo Takondwa, Birbeck Gretchen L, Andary Michael, Horner Michael, Herrmann David N

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Research on neuromuscular disorders in sub-Saharan Africa is scarce. We aimed to delineate referral characteristics and the neuromuscular disorders observed among electrodiagnostic (EDX) consultations in a tertiary care setting in Zambia.

METHODS

EDX records were reviewed for all specialist-performed studies after the establishment of the laboratory. The frequency of demographic, medical characteristics, and final EDX impressions are presented.

RESULTS

Among 108 referrals, 52% were male, 84% were adults (mean age 44 years). Referrals were predominantly outpatients (85%) and sent by neurologists (68%). HIV infection was common (12%). Diabetes was rare (3%). Overall, 77% of studies were abnormal. Polyneuropathy was the most common abnormal EDX finding, followed by motor neuron disease.

DISCUSSION: A diverse range of neuromuscular diseases was evaluated among EDX referrals in Zambia. Though labor and expertise intensive, access to EDX consultation can enhance clinical care and facilitate research and surveillance of neuromuscular disorders in the region.

Для цитирования: Kvalsund Michelle, Mukomena Patrice, Chidumayo Takondwa, Birbeck Gretchen L, Andary Michael, Horner Michael, Herrmann David N. Electrodiagnostic consultations in Zambia: Referral characteristics and neuromuscular disorders.. Journal of the neurological sciences. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.12.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.