Cardiovascular diabetology · 2023
Assessment of left atrioventricular coupling and left atrial function impairment in diabetes with and without hypertension using CMR feature tracking.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shi Rui, Jiang Yi-Ning, Qian Wen-Lei, Guo Ying-Kun, Gao Yue, Shen Li-Ting, Jiang Li, Li Xue-Ming, Yang Zhi-Gang, Li Yuan
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The study was designed to assess the effect of co-occurrence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension on the deterioration of left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI) and left atrial (LA) function in comparison to individuals suffering from DM only.
METHODS: From December 2015 to June 2022, we consecutively recruited patients with clinically diagnosed DM who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at our hospital. The study comprised a total of 176 patients with DM, who were divided into two groups based on their blood pressure status: 103 with hypertension (DM + HP) and 73 without hypertension (DM-HP). LA reservoir function (reservoir strain (εs), total LA ejection fraction (LAEF)), conduit function (conduit strain (εe), passive LAEF), booster-pump function (booster strain (εa) and active LAEF), LA volume index (LAVI), LV global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), and LACI were evaluated and compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: After adjusting for age, sex, body surface area (BSA), and history of current smoking, total LAEF (61.16 ± 14.04 vs. 56.05 ± 12.72, p = 0.013) and active LAEF (43.98 ± 14.33 vs. 38.72 ± 13.51, p = 0.017) were lower, while passive LAEF (33.22 ± 14.11 vs. 31.28 ± 15.01, p = 0.807) remained unchanged in the DM + HP group compared to the DM-HP group. The DM + HP group had decreased εs (41.27 ± 18.89 vs. 33.41 ± 13.94, p = 0.006), εe (23.69 ± 12.96 vs. 18.90 ± 9.90, p = 0.037), εa (17.83 ± 8.09 vs. 14.93 ± 6.63, p = 0.019), and increased LACI (17.40±10.28 vs. 22.72±15.01, p = 0.049) when compared to the DM-HP group. In patients with DM, multivariate analysis revealed significant independent associations between LV GLS and εs (β=-1.286, p < 0.001), εe (β=-0.919, p < 0.001), and εa (β=-0.324, p = 0.036). However, there was no significant association observed between LV GLS and LACI (β=-0.003, p = 0.075). Additionally, hypertension was found to independently contribute to decreased εa (β=-2.508, p = 0.027) and increased LACI in individuals with DM (β = 0.05, p = 0.011).
CONCLUSIONS: In DM patients, LV GLS showed a significant association with LA phasic strain. Hypertension was found to exacerbate the decline in LA booster strain and increase LACI in DM patients, indicating potential atrioventricular coupling index alterations.
METHODS: From December 2015 to June 2022, we consecutively recruited patients with clinically diagnosed DM who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at our hospital. The study comprised a total of 176 patients with DM, who were divided into two groups based on their blood pressure status: 103 with hypertension (DM + HP) and 73 without hypertension (DM-HP). LA reservoir function (reservoir strain (εs), total LA ejection fraction (LAEF)), conduit function (conduit strain (εe), passive LAEF), booster-pump function (booster strain (εa) and active LAEF), LA volume index (LAVI), LV global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), and LACI were evaluated and compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: After adjusting for age, sex, body surface area (BSA), and history of current smoking, total LAEF (61.16 ± 14.04 vs. 56.05 ± 12.72, p = 0.013) and active LAEF (43.98 ± 14.33 vs. 38.72 ± 13.51, p = 0.017) were lower, while passive LAEF (33.22 ± 14.11 vs. 31.28 ± 15.01, p = 0.807) remained unchanged in the DM + HP group compared to the DM-HP group. The DM + HP group had decreased εs (41.27 ± 18.89 vs. 33.41 ± 13.94, p = 0.006), εe (23.69 ± 12.96 vs. 18.90 ± 9.90, p = 0.037), εa (17.83 ± 8.09 vs. 14.93 ± 6.63, p = 0.019), and increased LACI (17.40±10.28 vs. 22.72±15.01, p = 0.049) when compared to the DM-HP group. In patients with DM, multivariate analysis revealed significant independent associations between LV GLS and εs (β=-1.286, p < 0.001), εe (β=-0.919, p < 0.001), and εa (β=-0.324, p = 0.036). However, there was no significant association observed between LV GLS and LACI (β=-0.003, p = 0.075). Additionally, hypertension was found to independently contribute to decreased εa (β=-2.508, p = 0.027) and increased LACI in individuals with DM (β = 0.05, p = 0.011).
CONCLUSIONS: In DM patients, LV GLS showed a significant association with LA phasic strain. Hypertension was found to exacerbate the decline in LA booster strain and increase LACI in DM patients, indicating potential atrioventricular coupling index alterations.