Intra-individual variability of penetrating keratoplasty outcome after excimer laser versus motorized corneal trephination.

PURPOSE: To assess the intra-individual variability of outcomes after penetrating keratoplasty by comparing mechanical and nonmechanical corneal trephination.

METHODS

Fifteen patients (30 eyes, 16 with keratoconus and 14 with Fuchs' dystrophy; median age at penetrating keratoplasty 56.3/53.5 years) were assessed whose trephination was performed using a motor trephine in one eye and the 193-nm excimer laser (MEL 60, Carl Zeiss-Meditec) in the other eye by one experienced surgeon. Subjective refractometry, standard keratometry, and corneal topography were used to assess best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA); spherical equivalent refraction; keratometric and topographic central corneal power; refractive, keratometric, and topographic astigmatism; surface regularity index; surface asymmetry index; and potential visual acuity preoperatively, before first suture removal (at 1 year), and at last available follow-up after final suture removal but before additional surgery (1.3 and 1.9 years, respectively).

RESULTS

Before first suture removal BSCVA was significantly higher (0.7 vs 0.5; P=.008) after excimer laser trephination. At the end of follow-up, refractive/ keratometric/topographic astigmatism (2.20/2.10/2.40 diopters [D] vs 5.00/6.00/7.10 D) and surface regularity index (0.8 vs 1.1) were significantly lower (P=.02, P=.005, P=.01, and P=.03, respectively) and potential visual acuity was significantly higher (0.9/0.6; P=.02) after excimer laser trephination.

CONCLUSIONS

During long-term follow-up, all-sutures-out postkeratoplasty astigmatism and surface regularity are superior in the eye where nonmechanical excimer laser was applied in contrast to the fellow eye with motor trephination in the same individual.