MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bjo.2005.079624

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of ophthalmology · 2006

Repeat penetrating keratoplasty: indications, graft survival, and visual outcome.

Al-Mezaine H, Wagoner M D, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital Cornea Transplant Study Group

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: To determine graft survival and visual outcome after repeat penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).

METHODS

Retrospective review of the medical records patients who underwent repeat PKP at the King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital (KKESH) between 1 January 1991 and 31 December 2002.

RESULTS

243 repeat PKP performed in 210 eyes of 208 patients, who had also had initial PKP at KKESH, were included in the study. The mean follow up was 43 months (range 1-170). At the most recent examination, 114 (54.3%) grafts were clear. The overall survival rate was 98% at 1 year, 83% at 2 years, and 49% at 5 years. The best graft survival was in eyes with an original diagnosis of keratoconus (93.8%) and the worst was in eyes with Fuchs' dystrophy (23.1%). Overall, 29.6% of eyes achieved a final visual acuity greater than 20/200, while only 4.8% were 20/40 or better. The best visual prognosis was in eyes with an original diagnosis of stromal dystrophy and keratoconus.

CONCLUSION

Although the prognosis for repeat PKP is poorer than that of initial PKP, reasonable outcomes can be obtained with repeat PKP with careful case selection.

Для цитирования: Al-Mezaine H, Wagoner M D, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital Cornea Transplant Study Group. Repeat penetrating keratoplasty: indications, graft survival, and visual outcome.. The British journal of ophthalmology. 2006. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.079624.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.