European radiology · 2025
Effects of patient and imaging factors on small bowel motility scores derived from deep learning-based segmentation of cine MRI.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Heo Subin, Yun Jihye, Kim Dong Wook, Park Seo Young, Choi Sang Hyun, Kim Kyuwon, Jung Kee Wook, Myung Seung-Jae, Park Seong Ho
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Small bowel motility can be quantified using cine MRI, but the influence of patient and imaging factors on motility scores remains unclear. This study evaluated whether patient and imaging factors affect motility scores derived from deep learning-based segmentation of cine MRI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients (mean age 53.6 ± 16.4 years; 34 women) with chronic constipation or suspected colonic pseudo-obstruction who underwent cine MRI covering the entire small bowel between 2022 and 2023 were included. A deep learning algorithm was developed to segment small bowel regions, and motility was quantified with an optical flow-based algorithm, producing a motility score for each slice. Associations of motility scores with patient factors (age, sex, body mass index, symptoms, and bowel distension) and MRI slice-related factors (anatomical location, bowel area, and anteroposterior position) were analyzed using linear mixed models.
RESULTS: Deep learning-based small bowel segmentation achieved a mean volumetric Dice similarity coefficient of 75.4 ± 18.9%, with a manual correction time of 26.5 ± 13.5 s. Median motility scores per patient ranged from 26.4 to 64.4, with an interquartile range of 3.1-26.6. Multivariable analysis revealed that MRI slice-related factors, including anatomical location with mixed ileum and jejunum (β = -4.9; p = 0.01, compared with ileum dominant), bowel area (first order β = -0.2, p < 0.001; second order β = 5.7 × 10-4, p < 0.001), and anteroposterior position (first order β = -51.5, p < 0.001; second order β = 28.8, p = 0.004) were significantly associated with motility scores. Patient factors showed no association with motility scores.
CONCLUSION: Small bowel motility scores were significantly associated with MRI slice-related factors. Determining global motility without adjusting for these factors may be limited.
KEY POINTS: Question Global small bowel motility can be quantified from cine MRI; however, the confounding factors affecting motility scores remain unclear. Findings Motility scores were significantly influenced by MRI slice-related factors, including anatomical location, bowel area, and anteroposterior position. Clinical relevance Adjusting for slice-related factors is essential for accurate interpretation of small bowel motility scores on cine MRI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients (mean age 53.6 ± 16.4 years; 34 women) with chronic constipation or suspected colonic pseudo-obstruction who underwent cine MRI covering the entire small bowel between 2022 and 2023 were included. A deep learning algorithm was developed to segment small bowel regions, and motility was quantified with an optical flow-based algorithm, producing a motility score for each slice. Associations of motility scores with patient factors (age, sex, body mass index, symptoms, and bowel distension) and MRI slice-related factors (anatomical location, bowel area, and anteroposterior position) were analyzed using linear mixed models.
RESULTS: Deep learning-based small bowel segmentation achieved a mean volumetric Dice similarity coefficient of 75.4 ± 18.9%, with a manual correction time of 26.5 ± 13.5 s. Median motility scores per patient ranged from 26.4 to 64.4, with an interquartile range of 3.1-26.6. Multivariable analysis revealed that MRI slice-related factors, including anatomical location with mixed ileum and jejunum (β = -4.9; p = 0.01, compared with ileum dominant), bowel area (first order β = -0.2, p < 0.001; second order β = 5.7 × 10-4, p < 0.001), and anteroposterior position (first order β = -51.5, p < 0.001; second order β = 28.8, p = 0.004) were significantly associated with motility scores. Patient factors showed no association with motility scores.
CONCLUSION: Small bowel motility scores were significantly associated with MRI slice-related factors. Determining global motility without adjusting for these factors may be limited.
KEY POINTS: Question Global small bowel motility can be quantified from cine MRI; however, the confounding factors affecting motility scores remain unclear. Findings Motility scores were significantly influenced by MRI slice-related factors, including anatomical location, bowel area, and anteroposterior position. Clinical relevance Adjusting for slice-related factors is essential for accurate interpretation of small bowel motility scores on cine MRI.