MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Chang Gung medical journal · 2005

Retinopathy of prematurity: an evaluation in the Keelung area of Taiwan over a 10-year period.

Yang Ko-Jen, Tsai Chen-Hsin, Lai Chi-Chun, Lu Chia-Shun, Chen Tun-Lu

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

We report on the experience of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) at Chang Gang Memorial Hospital (CGMH), Keelung, Taiwan over a 10-year period.

METHODS

A retrospective review was made of data of all premature infants with a diagnosis of ROP at Keelung CGMH between 1994 and 2003. Data on certain characteristics including gender, gestational age (GA), birth body weight (BBW), stage of ROP, and treatment modalities were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 458 infants screened for ROP, 148 eyes of 74 premature infants were diagnosed as having ROP. Threshold ROP occurred in 24 eyes of 12 infants. The average BBW and GA were significantly lower in the threshold than in the non-threshold ROP group (p < 0.05). According to medical records of the 24 eyes of the 12 patients receiving transscleral cryotherapy, anatomical success was attained in 13 (81.3%) of 16 eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

This review found low GA and BBW to be major risk factors for ROP. This review shows that transscleral cryotherapy for treating threshold ROP achieved anatomical success in about 80% of eyes. However, myopia, amblyopia, and strabismus remain major sequelae. Laser therapy is now believed to be less damaging to ocular structures and just as effective as cryotherapy in treating ROP.

Для цитирования: Yang Ko-Jen, Tsai Chen-Hsin, Lai Chi-Chun, Lu Chia-Shun, Chen Tun-Lu. Retinopathy of prematurity: an evaluation in the Keelung area of Taiwan over a 10-year period.. Chang Gung medical journal. 2005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.